Hadīth
I. Introduction
A narrative informs us that the sūrahs of the Qur’ān have been arranged in a certain sequence: First the seven long sūrahs called the sab‘ tiwāl,[1]then the mi’īn sūrahs, then the mathānī and the mufassal at the end.
In this article, the authenticity of this narrative shall be assessed.
II. Representative Texts
حدثنا هشام بن إسماعيل الدمشقي ، عن محمد بن شعيب عن سعيد بن بشير ، عن قتادة ، عن أبي المليح ، عن واثلة بن الأسقع ، عن النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم قال : أُعطيتُ السَّبعَ الطُّوَل مكان التوراة ، وأُعطيت المئينَ مكان الإنجيل ، وأُعطيت المثاني مكان الزَّبور ، وفُضلت بالمُفَصَّل
Wāthilah ibn al-Asqa‘ reports from the Prophet (sws): “I have been given the seven tuwal in place of the Torah, the mi’īn in place of the Injīl, the mathānī in place of the Psalms and have been further blessed with the mufassal.”[2]
In a separate text, ‘Abdullāh ibn Mas‘ūd (rta) is reported to have said:
حدثنا معاذ بن هانئ ثنا إبراهيم بن طهمان ثنا عاصم عن المسيب بن رافع قال قال عبد الله السبع الطول مثل التوراة والمئين مثل الإنجيل والمثاني مثل الزبور وسائر القرآن بعد فضل
The seven tuwal are like the Torah, the mi’īnlike the Injīl, the mathānī like the Psalms and all the remaining Qur’ān is furthermore.[3]
III Criticism on the Narrative
A. Criticism on the Matn
1. No Explanation from the Prophet (sws)
There is no explanation from the Prophet (sws) as to which sūrahs belong to each of the four categories of the sab‘ tiwāl, the mi’īn, the mathānī and the mufassal respectively. Similarly, we have no guidance from him regarding the meaning of the terms mi’īn, mathānī and mufassal. As a result, people have attempted to give their own interpretations in this regard which has mostly resulted in differing opinions.
Sab‘ Tiwāl
According to al-Suyūtī,[4] one group believes that the first of these is Sūrah Baqarah and the last is Sūrah Barā’a.[5]
Another opinion recorded by al-Suyūtī is that a narrative from Ibn ‘Abbās (rta) reported by al-Hākim and al-Nasā’ī says that the sab‘ tiwāl are: Baqarah, Āl-i ‘Imrān, Nisā’, Mā’idah, An‘ām, A‘rāf. The narrator forgot the seventh.[6] In a narrative from Sa‘īd Ibn Jubayr[7] reported by Ibn Abī Hātim and others and in a narrative from Ibn ‘Abbās (rta),[8] the seventh is Sūrah Yūnus, while according to a narrative in the book of al-Hakīm, it is Sūrah Kahaf.[9]
Mi’īn
In the opinion of al-Bayhaqī, al-Zarkashī and al-Suyūtī,[10] it refers to sūrahs whose verses are more than a hundred or near to it.
Mathānī
In the opinion of al-Bayhaqī, they are sūrahs which have less than hundred verses, but more than those of the mufassal sūrahs.[11] According to al-Farrā’, they are called mathānī because they are read more than the tuwal and the mi’īn sūrahs.[12] Al-Suyūtī has recorded another opinion about the reason for them being called mathānī: they form a pair to the mi’īn sūrahs.[13] In the opinion of al-Nikzāwī,[14] they are called so because in them anecdotes are repeated for the sake of teaching a lesson and for informing us (وقيل لتثنية الأمثال فيها بالعبر والخبر). In Jamāl al-qurrā’,[15] mathānī are sūrahs in which anecdotes are repeated. Still another opinion recorded by al-Suyūtī[16] is that mathānī is a name applied to the Qur’ān as a whole and also to Sūrah Fātihah.
Mufassal
According to al-Suyūti,#[17]they are placed after the mathānī sūrahs being among the shorter sūrahs and are called so since there are a lot of divisions between the sūrahs because of the basmalah. Others say that they are called so because they contain very few abrogated verses and for this very reason they are also called the muhkam, as is specified in a narrative in al-Bukhārī from Sa‘īd ibn Jubayr.[18] Al-Suyūtī goes on to say that there is a consensus that the last of these is Sūrah Nās. However, about the first there exist the following twelve opinions:
i. Sūrah Qāf (50) (on the basis of the Hadīth of ‘Aws ibn Hudyafah)
ii. Sūrah Hujurāt (49) (as specified by Nawawī)
iii. Sūrah Muhammad (47) (al-Māwardī has attributed this to the majority)
iv. Sūrah Jāthiyah (45) (attributed to Qādī ‘Iyād)
v. Sūrah Sāffāt (37)
vi. Sūrah Saff (61)
vii. Sūrah Mulk (67) (the above three are narrated by Ibn Abī Sayf in his Nukat al-tanbīh)
viii. Sūrah Fath#(48) (narrated by Kamāl al-Dhumārī in his al-Sharhal-tanbīh)
ix. Sūrah Rahmān(55) (narrated by Ibn Sayyid in his notes on al-Mu’atta’)
x. Sūrah Insān (76)
xi. Sūrah Sabbaha (narrated by Ibn al-Firkāh from al-Marzūqī in his Ta‘līq)
xii. Sūrah Duhā (93) (narrated by al-Khattābī)
Another opinion about the mufassal as quoted in Imām Rāghib’s Mufradāt is that the last hizb (Sūrah Qāf (50) to Sūrah Nās (112)) of the Qur’ān is the mufassal.
Al-Suyūtī[19] goes on to say that within the mufassal sūrahs, there are long (tiwāl), medium (awsāt) and short (qisār) sūrahs. In the opinion of Ibn Ma‘an, the long ones end on Sūrah Nabā’ (78), the medium ones on Sūrah Duhā (93) and the short ones on the last sūrah of the Qur’ān.
2. Scheme of Sūrahs in the Qur’ān
Let us take a look at the table of sūrahs and the number of verses each has:
Name No of Verses
1. Fātihah 6
2. Baqarah 286
3. A%l-i ‘Imrān 200
4. Nisā’ 176
5. Mā’idah 120
6. An‘ām 166
7. A‘rāf 206
8. Anfāl 75
9. Barā’a 129
10. Yūnus 109
11. Hūd 123
12. Yūsuf 111
13. Ra‘d 43
14. Ibrāhīm 52
15. Hijr 99
16. Nahl 128
17. Banī Isrā’īl 111
18. Kahaf 110
19. Maryam 98
20. Tāhā 135
21. Anbiyā 112
22. Hajj 78
23. Mu’minūn 118
24. Nūr 64
25. Furqān 77
26. Shu‘arā’ 227
27. Naml 93
28. Qasas 88
29. ‘Ankabūt 69
30. Rūm 60
31. Luqmān 34
32. Sajdah 30
33. Ahzāb 73
34. Sabā’ 54
35. Fātir 45
36. Yāsīn 83
37. Sāffāt 182
38. Su‘ād 88
39. Zumar 75
40. Mu’min 85
41. Hamīm-Sajdah 54
42. Shūrā 53
43. Zukhruf 89
44. Dukhān 59
45. Jāthiyah 37
46. Ahqāf 35
47. Muhammad 38
48. Fath 29
49. Hujurāt 18
50. Qāf 45
51. Dhāriyāt 60
52. Tūr 49
53. Najm 62
54. Qamar 55
55. Rahmān 78
56. Wāqi‘ah 96
57. Hadīd 29
58. Mujādalah 22
59. Hashr 24
60. Mumtahinah 13
61. Saff 14
62. Jumu‘ah 11
63. Munāfiqūn 11
64. Taghābun 18
65. Talāq 12
66. Tahrīm 12
67. Mulk 30
68. Qalam 52
69. Hāqqah 52
70. Ma‘ārij 44
71. Nūh 28
72. Jinn 28
73. Muzzammil 20
74. Muddaththir 56
75. Qiyāmah 40
76. Dahr 31
77. Mursalāt 50
78. Nabā’ 40
79. Nāzi‘āt 46
80. ‘Abas 42
81. Takwīr 29
82. Infitār 19
83. Mutaffifīn 36
84. Inshiqāq 25
85. Burūj 22
86. Tāriq 17
87. A‘lā 19
88. Ghāshiyah 26
89. Fajr 30
90. Balad 20
91. Shams 15
92. Layl 21
93. Duhā 11
94. Alam Nashrah 8
95. Tīn 8
96. ‘Alaq 19
97. Qadr 5
98. Bayyinah 8
99. Zilzāl 8
100. ‘Ādiyāt 11
101. Qāri‘ah 11
102. Takāthur 8
103. ‘Asr 3
104. Humazah 9
105. Fīl 5
106. Qurasyh 4
107. Mā‘ūn 7
108. Kawthar 3
109. Kāfirūn 6
110. Nasr 3
111. Lahab 5
112. Ikhlās 4
113. Falaq 5
114. Nās 6
A little deliberation on the above table reveals the following facts:
i. We cannot ascertain where the mi’īn sūrahs end, after which the mathānī sūrahs begin. A simple glance at the table above will show that the mi’īn sūrahs are not grouped together. They are rather erratically arranged. One possibility is to regard Sūrah Sāffāt, the thirty-seventh sūrah having 182 verses to be the last of the mi’īn sūrahs because after this there is no sūrah which has more than a hundred verses.
However, two questions arise on this:
a. How can Sūrah Ra‘d which is the thirteenth sūrah and has 43 verses, Sūrah Ibrāhīm which is the fourteenth sūrah and has 52 verses, Sūrah Hajj which is the twenty second sūrah and has 78 verses, Sūrah Nur which is the twenty fourth sūrah and has 64 verses, Sūrah Furqān which is the twenty fifth sūrah and has 77 verses, Sūrah ‘Ankabūt which is the twenty ninth sūrah and has 69 verses, Sūrah Rūm which is the thirtieth sūrah and has 60 verses, Sūrah Luqman which is the thirty first sūrah and has 34 verses, Sūrah Sajdah which is the thirty second sūrah and has 30 verses, Sūrah Ahzāb which is the thirty third sūrah and has 73 verses, Sūrah Sabā’ which is the thirty fourth sūrah and has 54 verses and Sūrah Fatir which is the thirty fifth sūrah and has 45 verses can be classified among the mi’īn sūrahs since each has much less than a 100 verses?
b. How can Sūrah Shu‘arā’which isthe twenty sixth sūrah having 227 and Sūrah Saffāt which is the thirty seventh sūrah having 182 verses be classified among the mi’īn sūrahs since each has much more than a 100 verses?
ii. If the mathānī sūrahs are the ones whose number of verses is less than a hundred but is more than that of the mufassal sūrahs, a simple look at the table will reveal that there are many mufassal sūrahs whose number of verses is more than the mathānī sūrahs.
iii. Should the sūrahs having very close to a hundred verses (eg. Hijr which has 99 verses and Maryam which has 98) be classified among the mi’īn sūrahs or the mathānī?
3. Verse Number is not always Proportional to the Length
Since the verses of the Qur’ān are not of the same size and length, the number of verses itself cannot become a standard to judge the length of a sūrah. Thus there are verses which consist of just one word and there are verses which consist of several sentences. Why then would the Prophet (sws) use such a standard?
4. Contradiction in the Texts
Whilst some texts[20] report that the Prophet (sws) said that he has been given the mi’īn in place of the Injīl and the mathānī in place of the Psalms, others[21] report the reverse ie: mi’īn in place of the Psalms and mathānī in place of the Injīl. The narrative reported by Barā’[22] gives an entirely new scheme:
وعن البراء بن عازب أن النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم قال إن الله أعطاني السبع الطوال مكان التوراة وأعطاني المبين مكان الإنجيل وأعطاني الطواسين مكان الزبور وفضلني بالحواميم والمفصل ما قرأهن نبي قبلي
The Almighty has given me sab‘ tuwāl in place of the Torah, the mubīn in place of the Injīl, the tawāsīn in place of the Psalms and has further given me the hawamīm and the mufassal which no prophet before me has read.
Similarly, a narrative attributed to Anas ibn Mālik[23] also gives another scheme:
وأخرخ ابن نصر وابن مردويه عن أنس بن مالك قال سمعت رسول الله صلى الله تعالى عليه وسلم يقول إن الله تعالى أعطاني السبع الطوال مكان التوراة وأعطاني الراءات إلى الطواسين مكان الإنجيل وأعطاني ما بين الطواسين إلى الحواميم مكان الزبور وفضلني بالحواميم والمفصل ما قرأهن نبي قبلي
Anas said that he heard the Messenger of God say: “I have been given the al-sab‘ al-tiwāl in place of the Torah, the [sūrahs from the] al-rā’āt to the tawāsīn in place of the Injīl, the sūrahs between the tawāsīn and the hawāmmīm in place of the Psalms and have been further blessed with the hawāmmīm and the mufassal – none of the prophets before me recited the likes of them.
Moreover, the two narratives reported in al-Tabarānī’s Al-Mu‘jam al-kabīr[24] present the scheme in an incomplete manner.
B. Criticism on the Isnād
If all variants of the narrative attributed to the Prophet (sws) are studied, it is found that three Companions: Wāthilah ibn al-Asqa‘, Abū Umāmah and Thawbān narrate it from the Prophet (sws).[25] Their chains of narration can be summarized as follows:
1. Wāthilah ibn al-Asqa‘
Wāthilah ibn al-Asqa‘
Abū Malīh
Abū Burdah
Layth ibn Abī Sulaym
Fazārī
Ibn Himyar
Muhammad ibn Hafs
al-Tabarī
Qatādah
Sa‘īd ibn Bashīr ‘Imrān al-Qattān Sa‘d ibn Qays
Following of these narrators are regarded as suspect by authorities:
i. Qatādah ibn Di‘āmah
Qatādah is famous for tadlīs[26] and all variants of the narrative are his ‘an‘anah.
ii. Sa‘īd ibn Bashīr al-Azdī
According to al-Nasā’ī, he is da‘īf;[27] Ibn Hibbān[28] records that he has a very bad memory and makes a lot of errors and reports from Qatādah narratives which do not have any corroboration. Al-‘Uqaylī[29] records that according to Yahyā ibn Ma‘īn, he is laysa bi shay’.
iii. ‘Imrān ibn Dāwar al-Qattān
‘Uqaylī[30] records that in the opinion of Yahyā ibn Ma‘īn, ‘Imrān ibn Dāwar al-Qattān is da‘īf and Ahmad ibn Hanbal says that he is hopeful that he may be sālihal-hadīth. According to al-Nasā’ī[31] also, he is da‘īf. Ibn Hajar[32] records that he is sadūq and is forgetful.
Al-Mizzī[33] records that ‘Abbās al-Dūrī reports from Yahyā ibn Ma‘īn that he is laysa bi al-qawī and at another place Yahyā says that he is laysa huwa bi shay’ and that Yahyā ibn Sa‘id al-Qattān did not consider him worthy of being narrated from; similarly, at one instance, Abū Dā’ūd al-Sajistānī has calls him da‘īf and at another he says that he has not heard anything bad about him.
iv. Layth ibn Abī Sulaym
One group of scholars has regarded him to be suspect. According to Ibn Hibbān[34] in his last years, he had a bad memory and would not know what he was narrating, would mix-up the chains of narration and make mursal narratives marfū‘ and wrongly attribute reports to sound narrators; Ibn Hibbān goes on to add that Yahyā ibn Sa‘īd al-Qattān, Yahyā ibn Ma‘īn, ‘Abd al-Rahmān ibn Mahdī and Ahmad ibn Hanbal have forsaken him. He also adds that in the opinion of Ahmad ibn Hanbal, he is da‘īf al-hadīth jiddanand makes many mistakes. According to al-Nasā’ī, he is da‘īf.[35] Ibn Hajar says that he is sadūq, mixes up a lot, is not able to distinguish between his narratives and has been forsaken.[36] Al-Mizzī[37] records that Ahmad ibn Hanbal, Ibn Abī Hātim and Abū Zur‘ah regard him to be mudtarib al-hadīth and that Ibn Abī Hātim also regards him to be da‘īf al-hadīth. Ibn Hajar[38] records that Yahyā ibn Ma‘īn calls him to be munkar al-hadīth and Ibn Sa‘d and Ya‘qūb ibn Shaybah regard him to be da‘īf al-hadīth
v. Sa‘d ibn Qays
He is majhūl. No information is available on him. He could actually be Sa‘īd ibn Bashīr because in the given narratives Qatādah is the teacher of both and Muhammad ibn Shu‘ayb is enlisted as a student of both. After allسعد بن بشير could easily have become سعيد بن قيس.[39]
vi. Muhammad ibn Himyar
According to Abū Hātim[40] he is yukatabu hadīthuhū wa lā yuhtajju bihī. Ibn al-Jawzī[41] has recorded in his al-Mawdū‘āt that Ya‘qūb ibn Sufyān says that he is laysa bi al-qawī. Al-Dhahabī[42] says about him: lahū gharā’ib wa afrād.
vii. Muhammad ibn Hafs al-Wassābī
Al-Dhahabī records that Ibn Abī Hātim abandoned him when he was told that al-Wassābī was not attested to and that according to Ibn Mandah, he is da‘īf.[43] Ibn Hibbān[44] says: yughribu.
It may also be noted that the al-Tabarī narrative chain is broken because in the opinion of Ibn Abī Hātim, Muhammad ibn Hafs never met Muhammad ibn Himyar.[45]
It may further be noted that in a narrative recorded by al-Tabarī, one of the narrators below Sa‘īd ibn Bashīr is Dā’ūd ibn al-Jarrāh. This seems to be an example of tashīf because there is no evidence of any Dā’ūd ibn al-Jarrāh reporting from Sa‘īd ibn Bashīr or being the informant of the subsequent narrator: Muhammad ibn Khalf al-‘Asqalānī. It seems that the actual person who reports from Sa‘īd ibn Bashīr is Rawwād ibn al-Jarrāh because authorities specify Sa‘īd ibn Bashīr as his teacher and Muhammad ibn Khalf al-‘Asqalānī as his student.[46] In all probability, the word (داود) Dā’ūd could have become (رواد) Rawwād.
2. Abū ‘Umāmah
Abū ‘Umāmah
Abū Malīh
Abū Bardah
Layth ibn Abī Sulaym
Fudayl ibn ‘Iyād
Ahmad ibn Yūnus
Muhammad ibn ‘Uthmān ibn Abī Shaybah
al-Tabarānī
Following of these narrators are suspect:
i. Layth ibn Abī Sulaym
See above.
ii. Muhammad ibn ‘Uthmān ibn Abī Shaybah
Although some authorities have regarded him to be trustworthy, here is what al-Dhahabī[47] records about him: ‘Abdullāh ibn Ahmad ibn Hanbal, ‘Abdullāh ibn ‘Usāman al-Kalbī, Ibrāhīm ibn Ishāq al-Sawwāf and Dā’ūd ibn Yahyā say that he is a great liar and Ibn Khirāsh says that he fabricates narratives. Ja‘far ibn Muhammad al-Tayālisī says that not only is he a great liar, he attributes to people narrations which are never reported by those who have actually heard them.
3. Thawbān
Thawbān, the mawlā of Muhammad (sws)
Abū Asmā’ ‘Amr ibn Marthad al-Rahbī
Shaddād ibn ‘Abdullāh
Yahyā ibn Abī Kathīr al-Yamāmī
Ayyūb ibn ‘Utbah al-Yamāmī
al-Hajjāj ibn Muhammad
Hilāl ibn al-‘Alā
‘Abdullāh ibn Muhammad ibn Muslim
+
Abū Bakr Muhammad ibn Hamdūn
Abū Muhammad al-Hasan ibn Ahmad al-Makhladī
Abū Ishāq Tha‘labī
Abū Sa‘īd Ahmad ibn Ibrāhīm al-Sharīhī
al-Baghwī (in his tafsīr)[48]
In the above chain, Ayyūb ibn ‘Utbah is suspect.